Sitecore versus Episerver

  • 6-Mar-2018

These two Nordic-born (but now global) Web Content & Experience Management (WCM) vendors frequently get mentioned in the same breath, though under the covers, they are actually quite different. I sometimes refer to Episerver in shorthand as "a poor man's Sitecore," but as you'll see below, that's a real over-simplification.  Having just updated our evaluations of both vendors, it seems like a good time to contrast them.

How Sitecore and Episerver Are Similar

It's no accident that the two vendors get frequently compared:

  • Both are (proudly) built on .NET
  • Both hail from Scandinavia originally (skol!), but both have made significant in-roads into EMEA, Asia, and North America
  • Both go to market primarily via implementation partners
  • Both have been relatively late in building packaged cloud offerings
  • Both are developer-intensive
  • Both got acquired by private equity firms looking to pump them up for an exit
  • We ding both of them for overly-busy editorial interfaces in our WCM vendor evaluations

 Sitecore vs. Episerver

How They're Different

At RSG, we think Episerver and Sitecore are more different than alike. If you're an RSG subscriber, you can try our RealTime Vendor Comparison tool to see all the key differences, but here's a handful you might find interesting in the meantime:

  • Episerver has a dramatically simpler entitlements model
  • Sitecore is much more object-oriented
  • Episerver's core content model is more page-based, rather than Sitecore's placeless paradigm
  • The two vendors' all-important channel partners have substantially different profiles
  • Episerver can get hype-y; Sitecore remains a bit old-fashioned and nerdy
  • Episerver can become expensive, while Sitecore will most definitely set you back a lot more lucre
  • The two vendors have significantly different approaches to personalization and other marketing campaigns
  • For better or worse (see our research), Sitecore pushes integrated inbound and outbound marketing, while Episerver has expanded more via ecommerce
  • I could go on...

Note that I'm not saying that one is inherently better than the other because of these differences. I just want you to understand the full import of the choices you make. In fact, that's why RSG exists.

So if you haven't checked out our hard-hitting Web CMS platform evaluations, try out this sample excerpt and let us know what you think.


Our customers say...

"There is really no comparison between the level of detail and insight I find in the Real Story Group publications and other resources. Why is The Web CMS Research so good? First, Real Story Group avoids fads and takes a very measured, grounded analysis of changes going on in the web marketplace. Second, Real Story Group evaluates solutions holistically, looking at more than the software itself and considering the vendor's business viability. Third, Real Story Group can't be beat for having a conceptual grasp of what is really important in these products, and how they actually get deployed, from small implementations to enterprise scale. It's this thorough, totally grounded perspective that makes Real Story Group research an indispensable tool in my business."

John Berndt, President and CEO, The Berndt Group, Ltd.

Other Web Content & Experience Management posts

TeamSite Marriage Counseling

  • August 12, 2019

Was reminded recently in a call with an RSG subscriber that some TeamSite implementations linger on, like a really bad relationship you can't seem to end. Maybe it's time for counseling?...

What Is a Real Quadrant?

  • July 16, 2019

Customers have a love-hate relationship with marketplace "quadrant" diagrams. You suspect there's something not right in the arbitrary positioning...and you're correct!...