The 90-9-1 Rule, Forums, and Social Media

  • 20-Apr-2010

You may have heard of the 90/9/1 rule of social engagement: in essence, the rule posits that in a community, 90% of the people are passive readers; 9% are active participants; and 1% account for creating the majority of content. It's key to understanding how the growth of an online community works.

However, I've never seen anyone actually try to measure if this is true -- until I came across a post on the subject by Lithium's Michael Wu. He's got the graphs to prove what I had assumed; the usage figures of Lithium's forums show it's not a law of Medes and Persians, but rather a rule of thumb. (I'd love to see some data on a related effect -- if only 10% are active participants, a certain critical mass of users is required to make any community a success.)

However, Lithium doesn't actually want to be branded "forum software" anymore -- nowadays, it's a "social CRM platform." I can understand why, from their perspective; forums are often considered old hat, and not part of the hip and happening social wave. Many forum platforms have been around for a decade (as has Lithium) and it's not something people tend to get excited about. I think this is a mistake; there are quite a few scenarios best helped with the organized discussion threads in a forum.

Imagine trying to get help with replacing the thermistor of your car in a discussion on Twitter or Facebook -- it would take ages and get completely lost in other status updates. Yet there are forums for every make and model of car where people will virtually look over your shoulder to help. On one of the other forums I hang out at, there's a large discussion titled "what social media tools do you use?" -- but paradoxically, in the same thread, nobody has yet thought of the forum itself as part of that. Yet, I'm there, not just to gather some intelligence, but also just to be sociable.

So make no mistake. However far these tools branch out from their original premise, the DNA is still there. Lithium still pivots around its forums; and that's nothing to be ashamed of. But as Lithium continues to analyze what makes forums work, you should continue to look beyond a generic "social" moniker. Forget about meaningless labels; find out what, at its core, is the kind of solution best suited to your Community & Collaboration scenarios.

Our customers say...

"RSG's The Collaboration & ESN Software Research is the most comprehensive and detailed analysis of this rapidly developing marketplace available. Of particular value are the vendor profiles and the authors' depth of knowledge and understanding."

Dr. Martin De Saulles, Principal Lecturer, University of Brighton, UK

Other Enterprise Collaboration & Social Networking posts

Tech Selection Tip #3: Setting the Right Business Foundations

  • May 22, 2017

Take a clear approach to decision-making to keep the process moving and ensure that decisions reflect broader enterprise priorities. You also want to ensure you have an accurate picture of enterprise maturity and capabilities to incorporate new digital capabilities....

Selection Tip #2 - Build the Right Team

  • May 16, 2017

The main point here is that people with different expertise and responsibilities should have input into the process, although a business leader ultimately drives the decision-making with significant IT input....

Jive Software Sells Itself

  • May 2, 2017

Just last week we updated our Enterprise Collaboration and Social Software research and advised customers - "Jive is at a crossroads; as an enterprise buyer, understand that there are more likely changes afoot for the vendor itself."...

Is Facebook Workplace for you?

  • May 1, 2017

If you are considering Workplace, here is a quick visual decision guide. You can also download our complete Workplace review as the complimentary sample and read it yourself....