VC funding for Drupal?

  • 30-Nov-2007

I've heard from several different sources about a "hot deal" for venture capital funding of a Drupal-oriented start-up called Acquia. Acquia has been in stealth mode, but not for long -- "hot" means likely to get funded, perhaps by a consortium of VCs. Acquia will release has released an FAQ outlining the new company, formed with a CEO and some developers, as well as the participation of Drupal founder and über-committer Dries Buytaert as Acquia CTO. As Web CMS Report readers know, Dries is revered in the Drupal community by creating both a culture and a technical framework for the project where a thousand flowers could bloom in the form of pluggable, community-contributed "modules." Rare is the Drupal implementation without a unique bouquet of such modules.

As someone who tries to follow open source governance models I find this development fascinating. Clearly there's an opportunity here. Drupal is riding the Web 2.0 wave on two fronts: as a tool built from the ground up to support user-generated content, and (consequently) as a favored platform choice many Web 2.0 start-ups -- who sometimes found the product lacking the kind of maturity and readiness one would want to stake a business on. VCs are anxious to ride this wave. Some sort of formal commercial venture thus seems quite inevitable.

Acquia says in its FAQ that they will play nicely with the community and add new intellectual property to the project. That makes good sense for all concerned.

And yet, large raucous communities don't always cotton to even the hint of one of their members assuming a leadership mantle (or oversized share of profits) out of the blue. It's one thing when a commercial company founds a project (c.f., Zope or Alfresco) and then has to negotiate the reins with the community they fervently hoped would join the project. It's quite another for a highly distributed community to ingest a sizable commercial firm without feathers getting ruffled. I won't go out on a limb and predict the kind of turmoil and forks that befell Mambo and threaten Joomla! even today. But if you have staked your website, or even your start-up, on Drupal, you'll want to watch your interests very closely as this unfolds.

Our customers say...

"The reviews of various CMS packages in the Web CMS Research is well structured, allowing readers with different roles to easily examine each product in detail and quickly make comparisons between products. But even better than the excellent product reviews is the clearly written, comprehensive, and non-biased explanations of the Web CMS landscape. In addition to making it easier to more fully appreciate the massive amounts of product information, it also provides readers with great guidance that will assist them with any CMS selection and implementation."

Murray Thompson, P.Eng., Webmaster, City of Grande Prairie

Other Web Content & Experience Management posts

Liferay vs IBM WebSphere Portal

  • May 26, 2017

Despite many similarities, Liferay and IBM WebSphere are quite different different and suited for divergent use cases....

Tech Selection Tip #3: Setting the Right Business Foundations

  • May 22, 2017

Take a clear approach to decision-making to keep the process moving and ensure that decisions reflect broader enterprise priorities. You also want to ensure you have an accurate picture of enterprise maturity and capabilities to incorporate new digital capabilities....

Updates to WCM Vendor Reviews

  • May 19, 2017

Major forces are buffeting the Web Content & Experience Management (WCM) marketplace, and key vendors and open source players are tacking in different directions in response. Some are expanding the scope of functionality, others are narrowing their focus, while others simply sail on like it's still the good old days....