Delivering fearless advice since 2001. Here's our story
What Real Independence means. Find Out
Alan Pelz-Sharpe
7-Mar-2011
Tags: Document Management (ECM), SharePoint Ecosystem, Implementation, Marketplace at Large, Selecting Technology, Documentum, Enterprise Edition, FileNet P8 Platform, OnBase , SharePoint 2010
This past week in Los Angeles I spent a little time talking with three well established ECM (Enterprise Content Management) integrators and resellers. All three had started out business more than ten years ago, and had initially specialized in building and implementing solutions for the likes of Documentum, FileNet, Hyland, and OpenText.
Nowadays the bulk of their business is focused on implementing Microsoft SharePoint. Nothing unusual there: many well-established, mainstream ECM channel partners have now shifted focus to SharePoint. In conversations with them, all three integrators told me that when SharePoint initially hit the market, they thought that the writing was on the wall for their business. They feared the development work where they excelled -- building out major ECM implementations -- was set to die away, as Microsoft moved in, packaged, and rolled-up their space.
But it turns out their initial fears about declining revenues were completely unfounded. Business today is better than ever.
To quote one, "Everyone buys SharePoint on the premise that it will work 'out of the box', but when it comes down to it nobody actually wants out of the box." Of course he's right about that, and figures from Redmond indicate that a great deal of money is getting spent on customizing and developing SharePoint each year.
But what he said next genuinely surprised me, "Developing a Documentum or FileNet system could be difficult, but under the covers SharePoint is way more complex to develop on." It was a sentiment echoed by the others. Or to put it more prosaically, SharePoint often costs much more to customize and extend than so-called traditional ECM Platforms.
To be fair, these remarks need some context. All three firms specialize in what I'll call "true ECM" -- big and complex implementations. The work involves substantial integration with legacy applications, sophisticated business process management, as well as high volume, high throughput, highly scalable environments. They don't work with SMBs or on small departmental projects -- areas where SharePoint traditionally excels.
Still, as conversations with people in the trenches, they point to the conclusion that the larger and more complex the situation, the less competitive SharePoint can be.
Learn the real strengths and weaknesses of 23 major Document Management (ECM) products around the world.
Get the Real Story bi-weekly.
USA & Canada
+1 800 325 6190
UK
+44 (0) 20 3318 1911
International
+1 617 340 6464
All Other Inquiries
"The Digital & Media Asset Management Research is a straightforward, comprehensive document that's invaluable to anyone considering or implementing digital asset management. With a no-nonsense approach to evaluating the major vendors and best practices, this report is a true handbook. It's my new bedside reading..."
Faith Robinson, Director of Digital Asset Management, Quality Technology Services
Copyright Real Story Group 2001 - 2012. All rights reserved.
All analyst firms claim to be independent or vendor-neutral. We're different.
Get the real story on commercial and open source tools from a firm that works only for you, the technology customer.
Thank you for signing up for The Real Story Group Newsletter. You will receive our monthly newsletter, plus updates with new information on the technology streams you have expressed interest in below.