Formerly CMS Watch. Here's our story
What Real Independence means. Find Out
6-Apr-2010
Tags: Document Management (ECM), Vendor Viability & Financials
This past week I have been working to update our ECM and Document Management market analysis. The full analysis will be released to our subscribers in the near future, and I will be talking on the topic at AIIM Expo/Info 360 in Philadelphia on the 20th April.
I find market analysis fascinating and always enjoy looking at past years' analysis to see what we got right and wrong. One thing though never seems to change: the dominance of a handful of vendors in most markets we cover.
When you extract away marketing presence and get down to hard, license-based numbers in the ECM/DM marketplace, the split between the household names and the rest of the pack becomes quite dramatic.
![]() |
The image above is for illustrative purposes only; it includes our estimates of revenues deriving solely from ECM/DM licenses. My intent is to illustrate how the big names in this sector, those comfortable with the term ECM, are differentiated in terms of sheer scale.
Of course, and a small company making <$30 million a year may in fact be more stable and profitable than a firm making >$300 million a year. And just because you make hundreds of millions a year, does not mean your product, support, or services are very good. It usually just means that you have thousands of people in your global sales and marketing operation.
As you can see, IBM, Oracle, Microsoft, Open Text, EMC, and Autonomy are divided from the bulk of the market by an order of magnitude or more in terms of license revenue. Even though this market has a very long tail with literally hundreds of small vendors, the top half dozen players account for approximately 80% of the revenues, and 100% of the very large deals.
Learn the real strengths and weaknesses of thirty-two major Document Management (ECM) vendors around the world.
Get the Real Story bi-weekly.
USA & Canada
+1 800 325 6190
UK
+44 (0) 20 3318 1911
International
+1 617 340 6464
All Other Inquiries
"There are two main features of The Search & Information Access Research that keep me coming back to it as a reference. There are, of course, the reviews of the different tools, which are very helpful when I quickly need to learn about a new search engine. But of even more value is its treatment of the requirements and pitfalls of search implementations in general. Highly recommended for those considering a search implementation."
Ron Daniel, Jr., Principal, Taxonomy Strategies LLC
Copyright Real Story Group 2001 - 2012. All rights reserved.
All analyst firms claim to be independent or vendor-neutral. We're different.
Get the real story on commercial and open source tools from a firm that works only for you, the technology customer.
Thank you for signing up for The Real Story Group Newsletter. You will receive our monthly newsletter, plus updates with new information on the technology streams you have expressed interest in below.