HP MediaBin and OpenText Media Manager: Granddaddies that keep on ticking

  • 19-Aug-2015

There are some days when I feel like a relationship therapist for people who are unhappy with old versions of their DAM systems. In particular, our subscribers often ring me up to opine at length about bad experiences with a legacy version of HP MediaBin or OpenText Media Manager.

When these customers inevitably arrive at the moment when they want to consider alternatives, it's often a challenge to even convince them that they should look at the latest versions of HP MB or OTMM vs. whatever alternatives make sense on their new short list.

I might line up dozens of ratings from our research that show how these tools perform across particular use cases, or how well each vendor is applying the latest search or transformation technologies. Sometimes, these ratings demonstrate that HP or OTMM is a stronger fit than 7 to 10 other vendors.

And yet, I still hear, "I don't care. I just want a new vendor. I don't want to work with them anymore." That frequently recurring sentiment is usually a reflection of the support relationships, not the actual technology performance.

Both HP MB and OTMM have evolved in recent years. However, compared their competition -- particularly the growing SaaS mid-market -- they've been comparably slow to innovate. OTMM only debuted an HTML5 interface last year after a long delay (most other vendors did so in 2011 or 2012). We give the edge to the new version of OTMM over HP MB for user experience; however, the foundations of both technologies still resemble what was released 12 to 15 years ago.

One advantage both of these systems have is that they are known for scalability.  Additionally, they boast the functionality to support a very diverse range of complex scenarios within both marketing and broadcasting. But that comes at a hefty price, and it is usually as part of a broader enterprise deal that incorporates other HP or OTEX technologies. As such, we don't see SMBs sticking with -- or even considering -- these tools.

In addition, the majority of deployments for these tools are on-premise, not in the cloud, so you'll want to understand your deployment strategy before considering one of these solutions.

In the latest release of our research, we've updated the evaluations of both of these big vendors' DAM tools. You can also use our Realtime Vendor Comparison Tool to see our detailed ratings as well.

Our customers say...

"I was thrilled at the level of detail and the depth of honesty in The Digital Asset Management Research. Other research tends to want to rate a company for gold stars or magic numbers, but glosses over the real workings and customer experiences of the given vendor. This research is more valuable, and certainly more tangible than what other analysts have put forth."

Faith Robinson, Content Strategist & Industry Thought Leader

Other Digital Asset Management posts

Navigating the DAM Divide

  • October 29, 2018

RSG has seen an emerging divide between Digital Asset Management vendors who can handle really complex business scenarios and those oriented towards simpler use cases....

DAM Scenario 4: Product Asset Management

  • October 24, 2018

Scenario #4 in RSG's roster DAM vendor evaluation criteria is an essential use case for enterprises whose assets directly relate to products....

MD