Should You Use SharePoint 2010 for Public Websites?

  • 7-Apr-2011

We get asked this question a lot. 

As always, the specific answer depends on your particular requirements. Nevertheless, based on our customer research and recent product CMS selection experience, we can generalize that SharePoint remains poorly suited for most external web publishing environments, even in its most recent 2010 edition.

In an advisory briefing for our Web CMS and SharePoint subscribers last week, we describe eight potential SharePoint weaknesses for public-facing website scenarios. To quote from the advisory:

"Many of these weaknesses can be mitigated through extension or customization, but....this could substantially increase your long-term, total cost of ownership, compared to other, more focused tools from competing WCM vendors."

Keep in mind that SharePoint's sweet spot remains document-centric collaboration scenarios. Of course, it's possible that SharePoint could prove a good fit for your website CMS as well, but you should not default to that choice (or default to any other), and instead undertake a thorough review against other WCM alternatives.

Our customers say...

"For any digital agency, helping your client choose the right CMS is risky -- get it right and you're the hero, get it wrong and you compromise your entire interactive strategy. Real Story Group's WCM evaluations strengthen our understanding of the true weaknesses and strengths of all the major CMS platforms, enabling us to make expert-validated recommendations to our clients with confidence."

Bill Barbot, Founder, Threespot

Other Web Content & Experience Management posts

TeamSite Marriage Counseling

  • August 12, 2019

Was reminded recently in a call with an RSG subscriber that some TeamSite implementations linger on, like a really bad relationship you can't seem to end. Maybe it's time for counseling?...

What Is a Real Quadrant?

  • July 16, 2019

Customers have a love-hate relationship with marketplace "quadrant" diagrams. You suspect there's something not right in the arbitrary positioning...and you're correct!...

MD