Formerly CMS Watch. Here's our story
What Real Independence means. Find Out
13-Jul-2005
Tags: Web Content Management
Forrester has issued a paper on "Changing Perspectives on Content Delivery," where they encourage organizations "that need to deploy dynamic, personalized content experiences" to consider using CMS to deliver content instead of their application server. Although the Forrester brief outlines several options, very often enterprises perceive their choice for dynamic delivery as between a CMS and an appserver. I think this is a hobson's choice: both unfavorable and expensive options. Appservers tend to be complicated, immature, hardware-demanding, and expensive in this area, while CMS vendors are often deceivingly weak when it comes to delivery performance and functionality. Remember that much content can be pre-generated as static pages, even for personalization. Often you only need the "wrapper-pages" or a specific content area to be dynamic (while the rest can be static files). Notice that the Financial Times uses this approach. A few words of advice: Think about performance upfront. There is no silver bullet. Test, test, test.
Get the Real Story bi-weekly.
USA & Canada
+1 800 325 6190
UK
+44 (0) 20 3318 1911
International
+1 617 340 6464
All Other Inquiries
"This is an extremely deep dive into the actual inventory of social and collaboration software products and platforms, with descriptions, ratings, feature matrices and screenshots."
Scott Mark, Blogger on Social Software
Copyright Real Story Group 2001 - 2012. All rights reserved.
All analyst firms claim to be independent or vendor-neutral. We're different.
Get the real story on commercial and open source tools from a firm that works only for you, the technology customer.
Thank you for signing up for The Real Story Group Newsletter. You will receive our monthly newsletter, plus updates with new information on the technology streams you have expressed interest in below.