It's a truism of venture capital-fueled software vendors that they either hit liftoff or get cast off. There's no middling, happily-expanding-ten-percent-annually,-thank-you growth path like there is for smaller software companies who never dip into the VC well.
But what if that never happens? What if the software vendor grows nicely, but not at rocket-ship rates? At some point, the investors need to exit, and that usually leads to some sort of asset sale.
Which brings me to MarkLogic, the XML repository vendor with some nice technology in search of a general-purpose use case. MarkLogic has been successful, but never took off. Venture funds started investing in MarkLogic in 2002, with the latest round in 2009. To be fair, the company is trying to extend its runway with a "Big Data" story, but I'm guessing that at some point, perhaps some point soon, their investors will get itchy and try to exit.
I don't have any inside scoop on this, but I suspect both Oracle and IBM could be interested in the underlying MarkLogic technology, and both vendors could do good things with it. Other potential suitors include EMC, SAP, and OpenText. Hopefully not OpenText, though: that's where products usually go to die.
So if you're a MarkLogic customer, you may find yourself cutting maintenance checks (probably bigger checks) to a new vendor. If enough customers still show interest, that vendor will continue to support and maybe even advance the platform.
This outcome is certainly better than the alternative: a total meltdown a' la Hot Banana or Serena Collage, or a fire-sale to a direct competitor who squeezes you into a new platform, like the poor folks still running AquaLogic and WebLogic portals under Oracle.
Customers always suffer in any acquisition, but some takeovers are more painful than others. For its customers' sake, I hope MarkLogic fits nicely into its next home.
Enterprise Search Evaluation Stream looks at... Search Subsystems
"A search system consists of content acquisition, indexing, query processing, and administrative
features. At each price point, search systems offer these basic functions. However, the
implementation of these basics and the value-adding features vary widely. The questions below are
intended to provide a starting point for identifying the specific needs for [a] obtaining content, [b]
indexing the content, [c] accepting queries and displaying results, and [d] administrative services
such as control of results display, setting system parameters, and managing the performance of the
Learn the real strengths and weaknesses of major Search vendors from around the world, in our Enterprise Search evaluation research stream.
"There are two main features of The Search & Information Access Research that keep me coming back to it as a reference. There are, of course, the reviews of the different tools, which are very helpful when I quickly need to learn about a new search engine. But of even more value is its treatment of the requirements and pitfalls of search implementations in general. Highly recommended for those considering a search implementation."
Ron Daniel, Jr., Principal, Taxonomy Strategies LLC
Get the Real Story bi-weekly.
USA & Canada
+1 800 325 6190
+44 (0) 20 3318 1911
+1 617 340 6464
All Other Inquiries
All analyst firms claim to be independent or vendor-neutral. We're different.
Get the real story on commercial and open source tools from a firm that works only for you, the technology customer.
Thank you for signing up for The Real Story Group Newsletter. You will receive our monthly newsletter, plus updates with new information on the technology streams you have expressed interest in below.