Delivering fearless advice since 2001. Here's our story
What Real Independence means. Find Out
18-Jun-2003
Tags: Document Management (ECM), XML
Whenever a new technical approach becomes widespread, doubters raise performance and security concerns. Remember the gaggle of major Internet thought-leaders arguing in 1997 that the entire global network was going to collapse because of peering congestion and hacker break-ins? A recent SourceForge piece summarizes the case against XML. You guessed it: "bad performance, inherently insecure"... As always, we think the key issue is how you intend to use XML in a CMS context. Some key patterns are beginning to emerge -- for example, many enterprises are dealing with performance issues by conducting XSL transforms at content approval time (to pregenerate HTML) rather than at runtime. Other examples abound. So mind performance and security, but don't back off XML if you have a clear business case for the kind of content re-usability it provides...
Read the NewsForge piece (along with comments) and decide for yourself
Get the Real Story bi-weekly.
USA & Canada
+1 800 325 6190
UK
+44 (0) 20 3318 1911
International
+1 617 340 6464
All Other Inquiries
"This excellent research has saved weeks of work reviewing the marketplace to enable a tender to be sent out to just a handful of potential vendors in record time. Well done."
Martin Beake, ITT Consultant, 2Sys Limited, Malmesbury, UK
Copyright Real Story Group 2001 - 2012. All rights reserved.
All analyst firms claim to be independent or vendor-neutral. We're different.
Get the real story on commercial and open source tools from a firm that works only for you, the technology customer.
Thank you for signing up for The Real Story Group Newsletter. You will receive our monthly newsletter, plus updates with new information on the technology streams you have expressed interest in below.