Real Story Group. Make Better Technology Decisions.

Delivering fearless advice since 2001. Here's our story
What Real Independence means. Find Out

  • Schedule a Demo
  • Free Sample
  • Contact
  • Subscriber Login
  • Your cart is empty.
Sign up for our Newsletter
  • Home
  • Evaluation Reports
  • Premium Subscriptions
  • About
  • Blog
  • Buy Now
  • Recent Entries
  • Get Custom Feeds

 

 

 

Byrne Tony Byrne

Follow Tony on Twitter @TonyByrne

When employees reject SharePoint as a website CMS

2-Nov-2010

Tags: Web Content and Experience Management, Intranets / Digital Workplace, Selecting Technology, SharePoint 2010 WCM

If you employ SharePoint on your intranet, should you also use it publish your public websites?

The debate rages, and there is no universal answer. In our Web CMS Report, we detail SharePoint 2010's key deficiencies -- around cost, developer-intensiveness, usability, and more -- that tend to argue against the platform in public website scenarios, even for those licensees using it effectively in intranet environments.

Microsoft and its ever-loyal partners disagree vehemently, and point to the thousand-plus sites powered by SharePoint for web content management.

Recently, I've heard SharePoint adherents push a new party line: that customers can benefit from a shared infrastructure and platform expertise (intranet and website). This argument is particularly alluring to IT.

As marketplaces mature, however, lessons get learned and enterprises get smarter. Larger organizations in particular recognize that intranets and public sites remain two very different environments, in terms of both content management and visitor engagement.

I recently encountered two large firms where employees contributing content via SharePoint 2010 on their intranets told the marketing team not to deploy SharePoint for their public corporate sites. At one of the customers, the intranet contributors were in fact quite happy with their SharePoint deployment -- they just didn't think it would fit their public website needs.

Of course these are anecdotes and not a scientific survey. Yet I think the deeper story here is that savvier managers are learning the limitations of individual web publishing technologies -- along with the attendant need for different approaches to different scenarios. Consolidation around a single platform may be useful (sometimes) for IT -- but not always for the business side...

    Excerpt from the SharePoint 2010 WCM Evaluation

    Web Content Management Report looks at... Publishing and Deployment Services in SharePoint 2010

    "In SharePoint, publishing strictly works one way; you cannot do reverse publishing from target to source. This is okay for traditional publishing, but this may become a problem if your site has user-generated content that must be published back to the staging environment..."
    (p. 474)

    CMS Vendor Evaluations

    Learn the real strengths and weaknesses of major CMS vendors from around the world, in our Web Content and Experience Management research stream.

Tweet

close x

Free Sample Request

  Digital and Media Asset Management
  Document Management (ECM)
  Enterprise Collaboration & Social Software
  Enterprise Search
  Portals and Content Integration
  SharePoint Ecosystem
  Web Content and Experience Management
 Send me bi-weekly tips and insights from Real Story Group.
Your personal information, including your e-mail address, will be held in the strictest of confidence and will never be shared with anyone.

Subscriber Log In


Remember Me
Forgot password?


Not a subscriber?
Learn about our subscriptions

Research Mentioned in this Post

CMS Vendor Evaluations

Learn the real strengths and weaknesses of 35 major Web CMS products from around the world.

 | 

Our Newsletter

Get the Real Story bi-weekly.

Have Questions?

USA & Canada
+1 800 325 6190

UK
+44 (0) 20 3318 1911

International
+1 617 340 6464


All Other Inquiries

Our Customers Say

"The quality of the analysis and the writing is exemplary, and I cannot comprehend how any organisation contemplating a SharePoint implementation of any scale could justify not purchasing this research at a price somewhat less than a single day of consulting from the nearest Microsoft channel partner. A great return on the investment."

Martin White, Managing Director, Intranet Focus

next More

Real Story Group

Follow us on:  RSS  |  Twitter  |  Facebook  |  YouTube

Evaluation Reports

  • Web Content and Experience Management
  • Digital and Media Asset Management
  • Enterprise Collaboration & Social Software
  • Document Management (ECM)
  • Portals and Content Integration
  • Enterprise Search
  • SharePoint Ecosystem

Premium Subscriptions

  • Research Streams
  • Advisory Papers
  • Vendors Evaluated
  • Schedule Analyst Consultation
  • Online Education
  • Configure a Subscription

About Us

  • Our Methodology
  • Our Team
  • Media
  • Customer List
  • Events
  • Consulting
  • Contact Us

Need Help?

  • Talk to an Expert
  • FAQs
  • Customer Support
  • Contact Sales Team
  • Help with your account

Copyright Real Story Group 2001 - 2012. All rights reserved.

  • Contact Us
  • Copyright Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Log In

Remember MeForgot password?

close x
close x

All analyst firms claim to be independent or vendor-neutral. We're different.

Real Independence


Get the real story on commercial and open source tools from a firm that works only for you, the technology customer.

close x

Newsletter Signup

Thank you for signing up for The Real Story Group Newsletter. You will receive our monthly newsletter, plus updates with new information on the technology streams you have expressed interest in below.










Choose the streams that you’d like to receive updates for: