One of the first lessons taught to me in law school was "When you're arguing a case, don't ever ignore arguments against it and hope the other party just won't bring them up. Find them, then carefully defuse them." However, I tend to think that in software marketing, that last part gets changed to "carefully diffuse them." It sounds the same, but causes a lot more confusion.
This gets worse when two vendors go head-to-head. For instance, last month, collaboration and community software vendor Jive published a whitepaper called "Jive vs. Open Source." It argues the case for Jive just as I would expect a marketing team to do it. It mostly ignores the pros of open source (saying "there are no licensing costs to deal with," which isn't even necessarily true; it depends on the license.) But it also states open source cons without much effort to actually reason them. I particularly liked the out-of-context quote, "Open source projects focus on developing software that addresses a specific need, ensuring that the need is well met." The whitepaper doesn't really explain how this is supposed to be a bad thing.
On the final page, Jive states its advantages over Drupal. Acquia (the Drupal commercial open source company) took offense, and has now responded with a package called "Drupal Commons" as a specific alternative to Jive SBS. Unfortunately, Acquia is fighting fire with fire, using pretty much the same kind of superfluous argumentation the other way, talking about Jive's million dollar licenses and how they'd "love to show how Drupal can run circles around Jive SBS for a lot less money." Personally, I'm not quite sure I'd like software to run in circles.
This is just a little tiff between vendors, so why should you care? Well, both are making it abundantly clear that a vendor is not a neutral source of information (even if the vendor is marketing open source, like Acquia.) So wouldn't you rather get your information from people that are not trying to argue a case?
Of course, I'm now trying to win you over as much as these vendors do. There's a huge difference, though: it's not in our best interest to confuse you; we only win by providing you with clear analysis of your choices, depending on your specific context. And in this case, that means digging through whitepapers -- and more importantly real customer experiences -- so you don't have to...
Enterprise Collaboration & Social Software Evaluation Stream looks at... Discussion oriented software
"Coming from a longtime (and reasonably well-regarded) forum software vendor, Jive Social Business Software (“SBS”) is more oriented toward discussion than project-oriented interaction. ..."
Learn the real strengths and weaknesses of major Collaboration vendors from around the world, in our Enterprise Collaboration & Social Software evaluation research stream.
"This is an extremely deep dive into the actual inventory of social and collaboration software products and platforms, with descriptions, ratings, feature matrices and screenshots."
Scott Mark, Blogger on Social Software
Get the Real Story bi-weekly.
USA & Canada
+1 800 325 6190
+44 (0) 20 3318 1911
+1 617 340 6464
All Other Inquiries
All analyst firms claim to be independent or vendor-neutral. We're different.
Get the real story on commercial and open source tools from a firm that works only for you, the technology customer.
Thank you for signing up for The Real Story Group Newsletter. You will receive our monthly newsletter, plus updates with new information on the technology streams you have expressed interest in below.