Real Story Group. Make Better Technology Decisions.

Delivering fearless advice since 2001. Here's our story
What Real Independence means. Find Out

  • Schedule a Demo
  • Free Sample
  • Contact
  • Subscriber Login
  • Your cart is empty.
Sign up for our Newsletter
  • Home
  • Evaluation Reports
  • Premium Subscriptions
  • About
  • Blog
  • Buy Now
  • Recent Entries
  • Get Custom Feeds

 

 

 

Byrne Tony Byrne

Follow Tony on Twitter @TonyByrne

Finding the best vendor means treating bidders right

24-Mar-2010

Tags: Component Content Management, Digital and Media Asset Management, Document Management (ECM), E-mail Archiving and Management, Enterprise Collaboration & Social Software, Enterprise Search, Portals and Content Integration, SharePoint Ecosystem, Web Analytics, Web Content and Experience Management, Selecting Technology

Is it a buyers' market for content technologies? Some enterprises believe that technology suppliers are so hungry for business that they will line up for kilometers to respond to an RFP.

This is increasingly not the case. We're actually seeing fewer responses to even "good RFPs." I think there's a couple reasons for this:

  • The best suppliers are always busy, and especially in the areas we cover -- content technologies -- demand has remained reasonably high
  • The macro-economic climate has vendors and integrators scrutinizing sales costs and taking a harder look at where they allocate their bid resources

Consulting and integration companies are particularly busy. Are you looking for outside integration help to supplement your lean internal project teams? Well, you're not alone.

And what about software vendors? Well, we're pretty tough on them in our product evaluations. But it turns out vendors can be finicky too.

So, how should you proceed when you're looking to procure technology? This is not a broad primer. You can read all our blog posts related to selecting technology here. Rather, today I just want to urge you to think a bit more about the people on the other side of your procurement table. They're sizing you up almost as much as you're judging them.

Here's eight practical steps to keeping the best suppliers interested in working with you.

Set the right tone

1) Don't be bossy or dismissive. Not in the RFP, nor in person. If you talk to bidders like a servant, you won't get the best firms responding. The best firms are looking for a solid, long-term partnership -- as should you. Don't be fawning, but treat bidders with professional courtesy.

2) Give bidders a chance to ask questions, and answer them all for everyone, in writing. Aside from the obvious substantive benefits for all concerned, this can become an important get-to-know-you phase for both parties. Here again, tone and some degree of empathy matter.

For example, if as a (usually good) rule you don't reveal your project budget when bidders inquire, then don't just reply, "we won't say." Instead, respond that your project has executive sponsorship as well as an approved a business case, and that you recognize its general size and scope. And that you are looking for good value as well as a good fit. You haven't told bidders you're full of excess cash. You have told them you possess sufficient resources to see the project through. If you harbor doubts about that, then hold off on the RFP while you re-set your bearings.

3) Ask to see proof of any bidder assertions, but respect their time. Remember, if they're really talented, they want to make good use of their time, before and while working with you. If you include a proof-of-concept phase as part of the selection process -- and we always recommend that you do -- then let bidders know up front, rather than spring it on them later.

4) Try not to rush bidders unfairly. Giving a bidder two weeks to respond to a complicated RFP or RFI will lead to shallow, cookie-cutter proposals, and fewer than you expected. By the same token, don't rush your own diligence, either. Shotgun procurements, like shotgun weddings, lead to ugly divorces.

Get your RFP ducks in a row

5) Convey that at least for the most part, you know you what you're talking about. With RFPs as with life, smart is sexy. If you don't know the technologies or the marketplace particularly well, then I can guarantee you won't regret issuing an RFI first.

6) At the same time, concede when you don't know something, and be as precise and clear as possible in all information you provide. Vagueness makes bidders anxious they might lose their shirt or misinterpret what you really need. Some good firms won't respond at all. The others will respond with architectures and pricing all over the map, making faulty assumptions as they guess your true intent -- and leaving you confused about true differentiators.

7) If you want to work with the best people at the ideal vendor or integrator, persuade them that your project could present an interesting engagement for them.

8) Focus on desired outcomes, and inasmuch as possible, let the bidders describe how they would get you there. Don't box them in with excessively detailed assumptions about how you want the system configured. To be sure, some operational details will always be important; for example, you may need to follow a particularly constrained business process for regulatory reasons. In the event, just explain your constraints, and remain open to alternate ways of doing things.

R-E-S-P-E-C-T

You could sum this all up in a general life dictum, "show respect." And expect it in return.

Showing respect is not the same thing as being friendly. The bidder's salesperson wants to get friendly, on the assumption you'll become more malleable. Friendly or not, you will want to push bidders to show their best, and you should negotiate hard over contract and financial terms -- now more than ever. Bidders expect as much, and besides, they're very practiced negotiators. This is a business deal, and in the end, you can get to a win-win.

Our research offers specific advice related to selecting technologies within different marketplaces. If you think you need more help, contact us.

    Excerpt from the FatWire Content Server Evaluation

    Web Content Management Report looks at... Personalization in Content Server

    "If there is a shortcoming to FatWire's approach here, it is that the content assembly rules can become rigid and difficult to override manually once in place. Again, the product is optimized for..."
    (p. 273)

    CMS Vendor Evaluations

    Learn the real strengths and weaknesses of major CMS vendors from around the world, in our Web Content and Experience Management research stream.

Tweet

close x

Free Sample Request

  Digital and Media Asset Management
  Document Management (ECM)
  Enterprise Collaboration & Social Software
  Enterprise Search
  Portals and Content Integration
  SharePoint Ecosystem
  Web Content and Experience Management
 Send me bi-weekly tips and insights from Real Story Group.
Your personal information, including your e-mail address, will be held in the strictest of confidence and will never be shared with anyone.

Subscriber Log In


Remember Me
Forgot password?


Not a subscriber?
Learn about our subscriptions

Research Mentioned in this Post

CMS Vendor Evaluations

Learn the real strengths and weaknesses of 35 major Web CMS products from around the world.

 | 

Our Newsletter

Get the Real Story bi-weekly.

Have Questions?

USA & Canada
+1 800 325 6190

UK
+44 (0) 20 3318 1911

International
+1 617 340 6464


All Other Inquiries

Our Customers Say

"There is really no comparison between the level of detail and insight I find in the Real Story Group publications and other resources. Why is The Web CMS Research so good? First, Real Story Group avoids fads and takes a very measured, grounded analysis of changes going on in the web marketplace. Second, Real Story Group evaluates solutions holistically, looking at more than the software itself and considering the vendor's business viability. Third, Real Story Group can't be beat for having a conceptual grasp of what is really important in these products, and how they actually get deployed, from small implementations to enterprise scale. It's this thorough, totally grounded perspective that makes Real Story Group research an indispensable tool in my business."

John Berndt, President and CEO, The Berndt Group, Ltd.

next More

Real Story Group

Follow us on:  RSS  |  Twitter  |  Facebook  |  YouTube

Evaluation Reports

  • Web Content and Experience Management
  • Digital and Media Asset Management
  • Enterprise Collaboration & Social Software
  • Document Management (ECM)
  • Portals and Content Integration
  • Enterprise Search
  • SharePoint Ecosystem

Premium Subscriptions

  • Research Streams
  • Advisory Papers
  • Vendors Evaluated
  • Schedule Analyst Consultation
  • Online Education
  • Configure a Subscription

About Us

  • Our Methodology
  • Our Team
  • Media
  • Customer List
  • Events
  • Consulting
  • Contact Us

Need Help?

  • Talk to an Expert
  • FAQs
  • Customer Support
  • Contact Sales Team
  • Help with your account

Copyright Real Story Group 2001 - 2012. All rights reserved.

  • Contact Us
  • Copyright Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Log In

Remember MeForgot password?

close x
close x

All analyst firms claim to be independent or vendor-neutral. We're different.

Real Independence


Get the real story on commercial and open source tools from a firm that works only for you, the technology customer.

close x

Newsletter Signup

Thank you for signing up for The Real Story Group Newsletter. You will receive our monthly newsletter, plus updates with new information on the technology streams you have expressed interest in below.










Choose the streams that you’d like to receive updates for: