• Home
  • Research
  • What We Offer
  • Who We Are
  • Blog
  • Your cart is empty.
  • Log in
  • Purchase
  • Free Sample
  • Contact
  • Recent Entries
  • Get Custom Feeds
Team Blog
Thomas

In DAM, Flashy does not always mean Flex

Added By Kas Thomas at 11-Jun-2009 |

I mentioned in an earlier post (about the recent Henry Stewart DAM Symposium) that one of the big trends right now in the DAM world is a shift toward client apps built on Adobe Flex technology. Sometimes it's hard to tell the Flex from the non-Flex players, however, because the grey-on-grey look and feel can also be achieved with ordinary HTML and CSS, and some vendors have actually used those technologies to achieve a distinctly Flex-like appearance for their new UIs.

A good case in point is MediaBeacon, whose R3volution 3.0 product has such a convincingly Adobe-like facade that I mistook it for Flex technology the first time I saw it. But it's actually straight HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

MediaBeacon made a conscious decision to avoid Flex, not so much for technology reasons per se, but for larger concerns around Web standards. The company's CTO, Jason Bright, explains it this way: "Flex, like ActiveX, Silverlight, and Java Applets before them are, in a sense, replacements to the browser. Each replaces the web browser in a proprietary way. While I love Flex as a technology, I do not think it is a good strategic decision to throw out the traditional browser for a new client-server model no matter how attractive."

Part of the issue, says Bright, is the fact that Flash requires a plug-in -- it's not a browser-native runtime (any more than Java is). He adds: "Things like AJAX and HTML, driven by powerful libraries like Google Web Toolkit, allow apps to have just as much power as Flex, without replacing the web browser's native rendering capabilities." Plug-in technologies, Bright seems to be suggesting, do not steer the direction of web development. And historically, that's certainly been true.

But by the same token, web-apps that run inside the firewall (WCM and DAM apps in particular) are not necessarily subject to the same constraints as public-facing web-apps. An enterprise can choose to standardize on (or mandate use of) Java -- and Java applet technology -- or not. The same is true for Flex. Inside the enterprise, the rules are different.

Just bear in mind that the vendors who are switching to Flex are taking a gamble, and if you go that way, you're taking the same gamble. Plain old AJAX and HTML, right now, are the "tried-and-true" technologies of the browser-client world, and likely will be for a while. Bear that in mind as you go shopping for "new, improved" WCM and DAM systems.

Next steps: Get a free research sample or purchase complete vendor evaluations to obtain immediate access.

Categories: Digital Asset Management, Web Content Management, Industry Standards, Marketplace at Large, R3volution

  • Tweet This Entry

My Research

Remember MeForgot password?

Not a subscriber? Learn about our subscriptions

Categories

Channel

  • Collaboration & Community Software (158)
  • Component Content Management (77)
  • Digital Asset Management (135)
  • Enterprise Content Management (603)
  • Evaluating SharePoint (127)
  • Portals and Content Integration (345)
  • Search and Information Access (293)
  • SharePoint Across the Enterprise (64)
  • Web Analytics (169)
  • Web Content Management (848)

Analyst

  • Adriaan Bloem (94)
  • Tony Byrne (982)
  • Apoorv Durga (31)
  • Jarrod Gingras (49)
  • Alan Pelz-Sharpe (223)
  • Theresa Regli (85)

Topics

  • Asia-Pacific Marketplace (4)
  • Building Business Case (236)
  • Cloud Computing (9)
  • E-Discovery (11)
  • European Marketplace (28)
  • Governance (27)
  • Green Computing (1)
  • Implementation (320)
  • Industry Events (18)
  • Industry Standards (194)
  • Information Architecture (158)
  • Intranets (14)
  • Marketplace at Large (907)
  • Mobile Computing (4)
  • Open Source (127)
  • Selecting Technology (902)
  • Services Oriented Architecture (8)
  • Software-as-a-Service (24)
  • Usability (4)
  • Vendor Viability & Financials (192)
  • XML (93)

Industries

  • Energy (4)
  • Finance (11)
  • Government (34)
  • Health Care (10)
  • Higher Ed (19)
  • Legal (17)
  • Manufacturing (7)
  • Pharma (6)
  • Publishing-Media (15)
  • Retail (9)

Dates

  • 2010 (184)
  • 2009 (292)
  • 2008 (345)
  • 2007 (294)
  • 2006 (206)
  • 2005 (222)
  • 2004 (109)
  • 2003 (100)
  • 2002 (97)
  • 2001 (44)

Have Questions?

Sales & Customer Support

+1 800 325 6190 (USA)+44 (0) 20 3318 1911 (UK)+1 617 340 6464 (Int'l)sales@realstorygroup.com support@realstorygroup.com

All other inquiries: info@realstorygroup.com

Copyright, 2001 - 2010, Real Story Group. All rights reserved.

  • Contact Us
  • Copyright Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

The Real Story Group

  • CMS Watch
  • Enterprise Information
       Watch
  • SharePoint Watch
  • The Real Story Group

Research

  • Vendor Evaluations
  • Webinars & Advisory Papers
  • Online Education
  • Vendor Lists
  • Free Research Sample
  • Purchase Now

What We Offer

  • Research & Advisory
       Services
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Consulting Services
  • Customer Support
  • Contact Sales Team

Who We Are

  • We're Different
  • Our Team
  • Media
  • Customer List
  • Events
  • Contact Us

Get the real story via our bi-weekly newsletter.

Follow us on: RSS twitter

Log In

Remember MeForgot password?