• Home
  • Research
  • What We Offer
  • Who We Are
  • Blog
  • Your cart is empty.
  • Log in
  • Purchase
  • Free Sample
  • Contact
  • Recent Entries
  • Get Custom Feeds
Team Blog
Kemelor

Enterprise tagging standards help Web Analytics data accuracy

Added By Phil Kemelor at 17-Sep-2008 |

Readers of the Web Analytics Report know that there are many steps to creating a successful web analytics initiative -- such as developing a strong organization, and creating processes to ensure that analytics get integrated into the mainstream of a company's operations.

If you're a web analytics manager for a large organization, one of the biggest challenges you likely face in creating enterprise-wide standards is at the very heart of web analytics: data collection.

Typically lots of energy goes into data accuracy, but it's easy to forget that it accuracy is tied to complete data collection. Most issues of data accuracy can be traced back to tags not being applied to all pages, or within applications, or that variables aren't set up to capture the required data.

As web analytics becomes more critical to senior managers, the need to create "apples to apples" comparison of site performance among different regions, different countries, or multitudes of company divisions increases in importance. To develop this level of macro-reporting, you need to make sure that the data collected from your Japanese site maps to the same variables as the data from your site in Spain, the USA, and so on. This will give you the confidence to develop roll-up views of activity across the entire enterprise, as well as individual site performance reports that may be judged through use of the same metrics and with a data set that all stakeholders agree to be complete and accurate.

To address the issue of complete data collection across multiple sites, I'm finding an increasing number of enterprises spending time developing a global tagging standard. Simply put, this tag includes the key common variables required for standardized data collection to provide agreed upon management metrics. Local teams may then customize the tag with additional variables if they require more advanced reporting. I'm seeing this especially with international implementations of Omniture. One of the gotchas a global tagging standard of SiteCatalyst helps avoid is the possibility of sites using different variable mappings, which could yield very different report results.

Think about it: standard data collection drives standard reporting, which you then can base standard report consumer training, which can then drive enterprise-wide agreement about web analytics definitions and results. Makes a lot of sense to me...what do you think?

Next steps: Get a free research sample or purchase complete vendor evaluations to obtain immediate access.

Categories: Phil Kemelor, Web Analytics, , Implementation, Selecting Technology, , Omniture SiteCatalyst

  • Tweet This Entry

My Research

Remember MeForgot password?

Not a subscriber? Learn about our subscriptions

Categories

Channel

  • Collaboration & Community Software (158)
  • Component Content Management (77)
  • Digital Asset Management (135)
  • Enterprise Content Management (603)
  • Evaluating SharePoint (127)
  • Portals and Content Integration (345)
  • Search and Information Access (293)
  • SharePoint Across the Enterprise (64)
  • Web Analytics (169)
  • Web Content Management (848)

Analyst

  • Adriaan Bloem (94)
  • Tony Byrne (982)
  • Apoorv Durga (31)
  • Jarrod Gingras (49)
  • Alan Pelz-Sharpe (223)
  • Theresa Regli (85)

Topics

  • Asia-Pacific Marketplace (4)
  • Building Business Case (236)
  • Cloud Computing (9)
  • E-Discovery (11)
  • European Marketplace (28)
  • Governance (27)
  • Green Computing (1)
  • Implementation (320)
  • Industry Events (18)
  • Industry Standards (194)
  • Information Architecture (158)
  • Intranets (14)
  • Marketplace at Large (907)
  • Mobile Computing (4)
  • Open Source (127)
  • Selecting Technology (902)
  • Services Oriented Architecture (8)
  • Software-as-a-Service (24)
  • Usability (4)
  • Vendor Viability & Financials (192)
  • XML (93)

Industries

  • Energy (4)
  • Finance (11)
  • Government (34)
  • Health Care (10)
  • Higher Ed (19)
  • Legal (17)
  • Manufacturing (7)
  • Pharma (6)
  • Publishing-Media (15)
  • Retail (9)

Dates

  • 2010 (184)
  • 2009 (292)
  • 2008 (345)
  • 2007 (294)
  • 2006 (206)
  • 2005 (222)
  • 2004 (109)
  • 2003 (100)
  • 2002 (97)
  • 2001 (44)

Have Questions?

Sales & Customer Support

+1 800 325 6190 (USA)+44 (0) 20 3318 1911 (UK)+1 617 340 6464 (Int'l)sales@realstorygroup.com support@realstorygroup.com

All other inquiries: info@realstorygroup.com

Copyright, 2001 - 2010, Real Story Group. All rights reserved.

  • Contact Us
  • Copyright Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

The Real Story Group

  • CMS Watch
  • Enterprise Information
       Watch
  • SharePoint Watch
  • The Real Story Group

Research

  • Vendor Evaluations
  • Webinars & Advisory Papers
  • Online Education
  • Vendor Lists
  • Free Research Sample
  • Purchase Now

What We Offer

  • Research & Advisory
       Services
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Consulting Services
  • Customer Support
  • Contact Sales Team

Who We Are

  • We're Different
  • Our Team
  • Media
  • Customer List
  • Events
  • Contact Us

Get the real story via our bi-weekly newsletter.

Follow us on: RSS twitter

Log In

Remember MeForgot password?